Reconstruction Of Achievement Sports Dispute Settlement In Indonesia In Legal Assurance Perspective

(Case Study of the Parent Organization of Table Tennis)

Abstract

Paradigm and commitment of the state to make Sport a driving force to achieve national development goals in terms of education, health, economy, political, as well as social and cultural considering in the perspective of the global dimension of Sport is seen as a strategic activity that is able to become a driving force for the non-sports that constructs the will to achieve the welfare of the sports ecosystem. But in another dimension, the development of such a massive sport raises potential disputes and interests that can hinder the development and improvement of achievement such as the dispute that occurred in the Main Organization of the Table Tennis Sports Branch Reconstruction of achievement sports dispute resolution mechanisms in Indonesia as a model in resolving various achievement sports dispute cases appropriately, thoroughly, effectively which aims to ensure legal certainty and find a model for achievement sports dispute resolution institutions in Indonesia, independent in nature, and final and binding decisions The research method used in the construction and paradigm of the ideal model for the reconstruction of achievement sports dispute resolution within the framework of a normative juridical perspective, with an approach in the form of doctrinal law research that uses secondary data sources as well as comparative studies (comparison) of dispute resolution models in several countries that have legal system characteristics. and the level of significant sport development in the global social order. The necessity in the development of the dimensions of table tennis in Indonesia encourages the ecosystem involved to impose a conflict of interest so that it has an impact on the emergence of unresolved disputes even though the historical aspect of the implementation of the provisions of Article 88 of Law Number 3 of 2005 concerning the National Sports System has carried out by legal subjects in dispute and even the involvement of the government's role has not been effective enough to encourage the author to reconstruct the settlement of sports achievements disputes with a juridical paradigm and perspective as regulated in the provisions of Article 102 of Law Number 11 of 2022 concerning Sports limited by focusing on the construction of a dispute resolution model as regulated in the provisions of Article 102 of Law Number 11 of 2022 The Fundamental Values that form the basis and basis of the Table Tennis sports ecosystem in the commitment to resolving sports disputes over achievements in the dimensions of legal ideals in the form of justice, usefulness and legal certainty must be crystallized in the legal culture and obedience to the construction of settlements that have been built based on the spirit and commitment to increase sports achievement so that the dimensions of disputes that can hinder and kill potential achievements for the table tennis sport ecosystem become a common enemy to be fought and avoided. Therefore, the novelty value for this research is how the construction of a dispute resolution model as regulated in Article 102 of Law Number 11 of 2022 concerning Sports is expected to be able to answer and accommodate and be a responsive, adaptive and accommodating dispute resolution solution for the interests of the sports ecosystem. although the conception of an independent arbitration institution facilitated by the government will soon be established.